Newsletters
France's mission to the United Nations in Geneva said it "regrets" a social media post that criticized the United States over human rights, an apology that could clear the way for a new French ambassador to take up his post in Washington after weeks of diplomatic tension.
The dispute began in late July, when the French mission in Geneva posted on X criticizing the United States for joining Russia and North Korea in voting against extending the term of Volker Turk, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.
The post angered Washington, which responded by walking out of a U.N. Security Council meeting while France was speaking. Sources said the United States was also considering blocking the appointment of France's pick for ambassador to Washington in retaliation.
In a statement published in English on its website, the French mission in Geneva said it "regrets the 25 July 2026 message posted on X that called into question the U.S. commitment to human rights." The mission characterized the disagreement as narrow in scope, saying the difference in views "concerned one vote, and not the defence of human rights."
France's foreign affairs ministry declined to comment further on the matter.
A State Department official, responding to a request for comment from Reuters, struck a measured tone in reaction to the French statement. "We note and appreciate France's statement, and look forward to working together to further shared values and interests," the official said.
The apology was first reported by the French daily Le Monde.
The episode had stalled the confirmation process for Aurelien Lechevallier, France's nominee to serve as its next ambassador to the United States. Lechevallier, a former aide at the Elysee Palace, currently serves as chief of staff to Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot.
Paris had hoped to have him installed in Washington by September, according to a source, though the diplomatic standoff had put that timeline in question.
The U.N. Human Rights Council post held by Turk is a senior position responsible for overseeing the world body's human rights operations and reporting on rights conditions globally. Council votes on such appointments periodically expose divisions among member states, though disputes of this kind rarely escalate into direct friction between individual governments in the way this one did between Paris and Washington.
Set as preferred source
Set as preferred source
1 min read
1 min read
